BambooHR vs Gusto in 2026
Side-by-side ledger (100 employees, default modules)
| Line | BambooHR | Gusto |
|---|---|---|
| Provenance | quote-only | published |
| Mid PEPM | $10.00 | $12.00 |
| Monthly base fee | $0.00 | $49.00 |
| Year 1 effective PEPM | $23.00 | $25.00 |
| Year 1 subscription | $27,600 | $30,588 |
| Implementation (midpoint) | $2,250 | $0.00 |
| Year 1 total | $29,850 | $30,588 |
| 3-year TCO | $95,383 | $102,996 |
| 3-year PEPM equivalent | $26.50 | $28.61 |
| Source | [1] | [2] |
Math: $23.00 x 100 x 12 = $27,600 (BambooHR), $25.00 x 100 x 12 = $30,000 (Gusto).
Decision aid
Pick BambooHR when the People team owns the decision and the employee-experience matters more than per-dollar feature density.
Pick Gusto when Finance owns the decision, list pricing matters, and the buyer is fine brokering benefits separately. Wins on transparent self-serve pricing.
Which is cheaper for 25 employees: BambooHR + payroll or Gusto Plus?
Gusto Plus at $80 + $12 x 25 = $380/mo. BambooHR Pro + Payroll ~$10 + $6 = $16 x 25 = $400/mo. Gusto wins by ~$20/mo at 25 employees; BambooHR ties or wins above 30 employees.
Benefits administration cost?
Gusto Plus includes benefits administration with no broker fee; commission funds it. BambooHR Benefits Admin is a paid module (~$5 PEPM) and the buyer typically brings their own broker.
Which has a stronger native ATS?
BambooHR's ATS is bundled and well-rated by SMB-mid market users. Gusto's hiring tools are lighter and lean on partner integrations (Lever, Greenhouse).
Which can a sub-100 person company outgrow first?
Gusto starts to feel constraining at 100-150 employees when the HR depth matters more than payroll depth. BambooHR scales cleanly to 500 with the Pro tier.
Real migration cost off Gusto onto BambooHR?
$0-$2,500 in BambooHR implementation, plus 4-6 weeks of parallel running and 20-40 hours of internal People-Ops time. Most companies absorb the migration without external services help.